MuscleTech Anator P70 Review
Thursday, October 12th, 2006About halfway through my unsponsored review I began to get questions about Anator. I didn’t know what is was because I don’t read muscle mags for the most part. These questions did perk my interest a bit as Leukic had been proving itself quite effective. I thought to myself I might give this a try down the road as I respond well to anything monohydrate based.
Fortunately, at the end of that review I was contacted by MuscleTech directly and asked if I wanted to review Anator because “I had a good handle on the science.” (Thanks Jason
) I thought to myself this will be interesting considering no one does unsponored or sponsored MuscleTech reviews. Also, many forum friendly company reps so vehemently hate MuscleTech which has unfortunately influenced a lot members who look up to these people. I knew this would prove to be an interesting challenge. However, based on my success with Leukic and my past successes with their supplements I decided why not. Frankly, I’m not impressed by the reps most outspoken against MuscleTech and could care less of their opinion of me. I think for myself.
Anator’s formulation is based on research that focuses on the effects of insulin on post workout anabolism. The utilization of hyrdosylates, high GI carbs, phenylalanine, and leucine on post workout insulin spiking has proven much more effective then just normal whey protein and high GI carbs (van Loon 2000). This type of formulation was also further studied to maximize muscle glycogen resynthesis which is extremely important to a performance athlete such a bulking bodybuilder (van Loon 2000).
Another effect of heightened insulin secretion that often isn’t discussed is it’s effect on shutting down signaling pathways that effect atrophy or more commonly known as muscle wasting. This is where the relation of genetics and Anator comes into play. Anator puts you in an anabolic state by preventing the Forkhead family of transcription factors (FOXO) from entering the cellular nuclei to begin cellular apoptosis (Franch 2005). Also, this type of formulation counteracts catabolism by activating the PI3K pathway which limits MAFbx gene expression. When this gene is overly expressed it can lead muscle wasting (Dehoux 2005). As you can see, post workout insulin secretion is a potent anabolic factor not only by assisting with the absorption of nutrients, but by also shutting down catabolic processes.
The other aspect of the Anator formulation I love is the addition of creatine monohydrate. This is the only form of creatine academically tested and proven safe in healthy adults (Bizzarini E 2004). I also think it is extremely beneficial they added alpha-ketoglutarate to make the monohydrate absorption more efficient (Silber 1999). As a strong creatine monohydrate responder I did notice increased strength which only further shows how strong of a ergogenic supplement creatine is as it increases mean power output (Okudan 2005). If you are a creatine monohydrate responder and bulking you will not find a better formulation than this.
I wasn’t really a fan of this flavor. It’s not horrible by any means, my palate just didn’t agree with it. Taste is pretty subjective.
Berry Blast Taste: 9 out 10
This flavor definately appealed to my taste buds more so than the Orange Cooler. I always have a stronger affinity towards berry/fruit punch flavorings.
Cost: 6 out of 10
This is the only area in which the product could be improved. Based on the effectiveness I will remain loyal to this product. However, the price will turn a lot of potential customers off which is a shame. I do know there will be other similiarly formulated products released shortly within the same price range. I also know some have compared this to already existing formulas, but their formula ratios are off and you would have to stack them other products to get the same effectiveness. Eitherway, I feel MuscleTech could dominate this niche in the supplement market if the price were just a little lower.
Effectiveness: 10 out 10
This is hands down the best post workout recovery formulation I have ever used. As a monohydrate responder I will continue to use this product for any future bulking cycles. I did adhere to the post workout nutrional protocol which is key in utilizing the effectiveness of this type of formula, which was based on my own research. As a result I gained 7 pounds of lean body mass (9 pounds total). I would even suggest for a true hard gainer to maybe utilize a 3:1 carb to protein ratio for the first post workout meal. One thing I would suggest to MuscleTech is to put some sort guidelines on the directions to optimally utilize the Anator formulaton. It would serve the customer a lot better and would ultimately build a stronger relationship with their customers as well.
References
van Loon, Saris WH, Kruijshoop M, Wagenmakers AJ. Maximizing postexercise muscle glycogen synthesis: carbohydrate supplementation and the application of amino acid or protein hydrolysate mixtures. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jul;72(1):106-11.
van Loon, Saris, Verhagen, Wagenmakers. Plasma insulin responses after ingestion of different amino acid or protein mixtures with carbohydrate. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 72, No. 1, 96-105, July 2000
Franch HA, Price SR. Molecular signaling pathways regulating muscle proteolysis during atrophy. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005 May;8(3):271-5.
Dehoux, Van Beneden, Pasko, Lause, Verniers, Underwood, Ketelslegers and Thissen. Role of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Decline in the Induction of Atrogin-1/MAFbx during Fasting and Diabetes.
Endocrinology Vol. 145, No. 11 4806-4812
Bizzarini E, De Angelis L. Is the use of oral creatine supplementation safe? J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2004 Dec;44(4):411-6.
Silber ML. Scientific facts behind creatine monohydrate as sport nutrition supplement. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999 Sep;39(3):179-88.
Okudan N, Gokbel H. The effects of creatine supplementation on performance during the repeated bouts of supramaximal exercise. Journal of Sports Medicine & Physical Fitness. 2005 Dec;45(4):507-11.






View all comments | Leave Comment