I get a real entertainment thrill when I watch the news struggle with simple concepts. Simple economic concepts. Then they interview the worlds dumbest economists who just don’t know the answer.
Earlier today, I saw on the news an economist who thought wheat prices are rising because the third world nations are becoming more wealthy and the people are more able to buy food. Where to start with this one? Well, if they are wealthier, why do they not have the money to pay back thier loans? I mean if you have money, pay your bills.
If they have more money, why do we have so many people in this country complianing about poverty in those other countries?
It is true, however, that they do have a little more money, and it does contribute a little to the wheat prices, but not much.
Now I am watching a news program where the economist thinks the price of wheat is up 100% in the past 12 months because of a drought in Australia, and rains in Europe. Let’s start with the fact that prices started rising last year. The drought and rains didn’t start until this year. So, FAIL! In the US and Canada, where most of the world’s wheat is grown, prices are still high and there is no problem growing the wheat.
Yes, the drought and rains are contributing to the price rises this year, but that is not the reason for the increased wheat prices.
So what is the real reason?
Ready?
Ethanol. Yup, that stuff that is finding it’s way into our cars’ fuel tanks. The farmers have switched to corn. Last year, they planted normal. Then the PResident made his State of the Union speech, remember when he talked about pushing ethanol. Corn prices spiked because everyone new it would drain the corn out of the economy. The farmers responded by planting corn in their second planting and even more this year. Look for corn to fall in the middle of next year.
In the mean time, there is less wheat in the American and Canadian fields, as the farmers are trying to capture the high prices of corn. Look for soy to also be high, as well as many other crops.
It is very simple.
Problem, no one wants to give credit to the President for trying to reduce America’s dependence on oil. Supposedly he is a racist, anti-environement, bigoted idiot. To give him credit for anything good, destroys that list, so therefore, they have to find economists who are willing to embarrass themselves by avoiding the truth and the simple supply and demand economics.
There you go, another case of politics in your evening news.
Post by:
TDetroit
View all comments | Leave Comment