Romantic1983’s BodyBlog

Recently, with my added gains, I have been thinking a lot about cell volumization. I use size on-creatine (can be used post workout as well) during my workout for this reason, and people definitly notice a difference. I came across two recent articles here that are very interesting.

I think my reps and sets have kept me from compromising the structure of sarcolemma. The intense training to increase muscle cell volume aticle explains this as the cell membrane of the muscle cell and if compromised contents can get out and there will be a drecease in size and muscle volume. I think a controlled movement is the key to preventing this. If one is going so heavy they are struggling by the 4-5 rep, youre going too heavy and not following a very controllable rhymatic form of lifting. If i find myself getting to that point. I decrease my weight so that I can effectively lift 10-15 times. I feel more blood flow and able to do what that article said and hold during the eccentric portion of the rep.

I am also curious about Creatinol-O-Phosphate (COP). This molecule has supposedly a high rate of absorption in the muscle tissue (performance enhancing compound). What I am wondering is how much creatine is generally lost through the process of Cyclization. That muscle tech article noted that: "During the process of cyclization, the muscle-building potency of creatine is lost when it is routinely converted to an ineffective by-product known as creatinine,which is completely useless for muscle-building." Do some recent products contain superior creatine thus making it easier to withstand this process? And is Aplodan, the new breakthrough? I have seen amazing growth with size on (go gaspari),just wondering how efficient this new product is, based on its chemical makeup