I really wasn’t sure if I was hearing correctly or not as I was watching MSNBC news this afternoon. So of course my curiosity prompted me to do a search for this article that was published yesterday, in the Washington Times. I cut and pasted the entire article and added the link at the end. Talk about a dramatic step and a violation of civil rights…. Oh and I especially dislike how this is in the BUSINESS SECTION of the Washington Times- Our rights I guess are just business to them. Whats next?? If we look to muscular and ripped - then what? are we going to have to submit to drug testing at our workplace based on what we look like?? The list in my mind can go on and on…………….
——————————————–
——————————————
From The Business Section of the Washington Times
Firms dock pay of obese, smokers
August 13, 2007
By Gregory Lopes
Companies seeking to cut rising health care costs are starting to dock the pay of overweight and unhealthy workers.
Clarian Health, an Indiana hospital chain, will require workers who smoke to pay $5 out of each paycheck starting in 2009. For workers deemed obese, as much as $30 will be taken out each paycheck until they meet certain weight, cholesterol and blood pressure standards.
Clarian employees will also be required to take part in a health risk appraisal that will inform the company which employees smoke.
Such appraisals are becoming a popular tool for businesses to determine the health of their work force. The type of health benefit program Clarian is setting up could become a model for businesses in coming years, analysts say.
“We anticipate that more employers will require employees to complete a health risk appraisal and participate in screenings,” said Tracy Watts, a health benefits consultant for Mercer Human Resource Consulting. “We also are seeing more interest in rewards for healthy behaviors such as participating in health management-related programs and for healthy behaviors such as not using tobacco products.”
A survey of nearly 3,000 employers last year by Mercer found that 53 percent required a health risk assessment of its workers. That number is up from 35 percent in 2004.
And 62 percent of the 135 top executives who responded to a PriceWaterhouseCooper’s survey this year said their companies should require employees who show unhealthy behaviors to pay a greater share of their health care costs.
Weyco, a Lansing, Mich., benefits administrator, recently adopted a policy to completely eliminate tobacco use from its work force. In 2003, the company introduced a policy of not hiring tobacco users and began offering smoking-cessation programs to employees, who were given a year to quit.
“While other employers’ health plan costs have spiraled, Weyco’s have stayed the same,” said Gary Climes, vice president and general manager of Weyco.
While charging workers who smoke more for their health care is becoming a widespread practice, more employers are adopting a punitive approach to employees who take health risks such as letting obesity and high cholesterol go unchecked.
Critics view the latest changes as an encroachment on civil rights.
Last month, the federal government implemented new rules to ensure these stringent wellness programs comply with the nondiscrimination provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
Health care continues to be the No. 1 cost concern for U.S. companies, said Helen Darling, president of the National Business Coalition on Health, a D.C.-based health care consulting firm for large businesses. That concern rises to new levels each year as the cost of providing health insurance for employees’ increases at twice the rate of inflation, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit health policy organization in California.
While many employers have been using financial incentives to encourage participation in wellness programs, Clarian Health decided to use a more strong-handed approach and charge workers more for their health insurance if they opt not to join a wellness program.
Clarian took the dramatic step of docking workers’ paychecks after several years of offering a voluntary wellness initiative. But Clarian’s annual health benefit costs increased 12.9 percent in 2006 and nearly 16 percent this year.
“We believe that by using this premium charge approach, where it shows up in employees’ paycheck every two weeks, it will keep costs in front of the person and we think it will be more effective at creating behavior change,” said Steven Wantz, vice president of human resources at Clarian.
Critics of the cost-cutting strategy accuse businesses of turning their companies into little police states through their health care coverage.
“There are several problems with the current approach,” said Jeremy Gruber, legal director for the National Workrights Institute in Princeton, N.J. “The progression of targeting certain groups — first smokers, now overweight people — will allow employers an unlimited amount of information about a person which has nothing to do with how somebody does their job.
“It’s clearly discriminatory, as employers ask workers to work longer hours with longer commutes than ever before, to penalize someone because they don’t have time to be healthy. It’s a huge irony that may run into legal trouble under the Americans with Disabilities Act,” Mr. Gruber said.
Employers are not the only ones touting the upside of a healthy lifestyle. UnitedHealthcare, a national health insurer, introduced an insurance plan last year that cuts nearly $4,000 from the annual $5,000 deductible for a family if a worker isn’t obese and doesn’t smoke.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070813/BUSINESS/108130052/1001
View all comments | Leave Comment