bodybuilding.com Store SuperSite BodySpace Forums
BodySpace  
Home BodyBlogs News Member Listing Help

ChiMike

"Focus on lagging body parts - chest, arms, back and legs."

View ChiMike's:

Contact ChiMike:
Send Email
Send Private Message
Leave Comment for ChiMike Leave Comment

ChiMike's Stats for To Cre(atine) Or Not To Cre
Created:11/17/2007
Last Modified:11/17/2007
Total Comments:1



To Cre(atine) Or Not To Cre

Probably not the first time that this question has been asked here, but I am on the fence as to whether to (1) stick with the basic protien shakes and BCAA’s (already added in to the ON Whey); or (2) start expanding into things like creatine, NO, etc.  I just don’t see getting enough protien for growth or calories without the shakes, so those are pretty much a given.  While my growth and adds in strength have not been skyrocketing with shakes and whole foods, they have been coming steadily, and I can see a gradual difference.  I’ve been temped to add creatine into the mix, given pretty consistent feedback that it’s effective; however, it seems like more of an artificial boost to me.  For example, I was researching various threads in the Forum and comments like "I’ve been off creatine for 3 weeks now, and I’m losing da guns!" have me feeling like the gains (if I used creatine) would be 50% me 50% chemistry.  On top of that, I would be dependent on the chemistry to maintain the results — just not sure that I want to go there.

On the one hand, whatever gains I’ve achieved so far have been due to hard work and diet (including the protien shakes), and if I failed to maintain the diet the gains would slip away — so what’s the difference if the diet that I keep maintaining includes creatine along with everything else I consume?  On the other hand, unlike the "I’m off creatine and I’m losing da guns!" comment, I feel like what’s I’ve achieved is not dependant on any one thing and that if I slipped for a week or two it would not unwind all of the hard work so quickly.

Like everything else (training splits, diet, specific exercises), it’s a matter of choice, and you have to do what works for you.  The feeling I’ve gotten from reading through the Forum is that if I used creatine to achieve certain results and wanted to maintain those results, I would need to stay on the creatine — that sounds like dependence.  I really don’t like being dependant . . .  I guess I’ve talked myself out of creatine, at least for the time being.  If anyone has any personal experience or feedback to share, please comment!

One Response to “To Cre(atine) Or Not To Cre”

  1. DerekATL Says:

    I know what you mean about not wanting to rely on chemicals to keep up your muscle mass. From what I have read, creatine has more of an impact on how hard you can workout and less on retaining the muscle you develop. From personal experience, I used creatine for six weeks or so with pretty steady gains he whole time (around 12 lbs in two months). I decided to take a break from the creatine and most of the mass stayed (maybe some water weight lost, but not much). I *did* notice a little less umph in my workouts though, which kinda sucks, but at least it’s not all or nothing!


Leave a Reply



Member Login

Sign in for more FREE features and tools!

Username or
Email Address:
Password:
Remember Me


New to Bodybuilding.com?
Sign Up Now It's FREE!